top of page

Book Reviews

Do Not Read This Book...
July 2021

My one word review of James Shapiro's Shakespeare In A Divided America: What His Plays Tell Us       About Our Past And Present is...
Do not read this book

Take a walk, clean your house, bake bread...
Life is too short to spend one more minute reading another work inspired by an author's revulsion to     Donald Trump
Because everything that follows is filtered through the lens that November 8, 2016 was another 9/11


Obviously, this was not immediately evident to me...because I bought this book.
But two pages in I started to wonder why...
I guess I was probably intrigued by some review that piqued my interest...
But right now I'm wondering where that could have been...and why I didn't pick up the usual clues   that this was going to be one more installment in that ever growing body of literature about how   Trump ruined everyone's lives...
But along the way, the author will inform us about the history of Shakespeare's plays in America

However, first you have to put up with Shapiro's shameless name dropping...


So he tells us that Bill Clinton, who wrote the forward for his Shakespeare anthology, recounted how   memorizing lines from MacBeth taught him "about the perils of blind ambition and the emptiness of   power disconnected from higher purpose."

And...yes...
Shapiro did write this unironically

And then there is the story of participating in an event with RBG which gave the author "an   opportunity to observe the exacting and brilliant mind of Justice Ginsberg."

Ok...

Once his Democrat bonafides have been firmly established...
Shapiro then lays his cards on the table...
And tells the reader that it was the election of Donald Trump that convinced him to write about   Shakespeare in a divided America
Now, he could have done that any time, but wrapping his history in the warm blanket of Trump   hatred meant the book might be read by more than the ever diminishing number of Shakespeare   scholars...
(Because the old boy is, after all, a dead white male...and so is now being thrown on the slash heap of   history along with all those other works we are no longer supposed to read because of their tainted   provenance)

The bookends to Shapiro's history of Shakespeare's plays in America
(Which BTW has the banal thesis that different plays were read in different ways by different people   at different times... No, duh)
Is the story of Oskar Eustis's production of 
Julius Caesar in Central Park in June of 2017..
In which Caesar is portrayed as a buffoonish Trump
Because the director wanted to "provide a cathartic experience for those of us who are losing our   minds."
And I guess Eustis thought showing a Trump lookalike assassinated on stage would do the trick.

Now, in fairness to Eustis, he recognized that this play has another message...
Which is that acting undemocratically in a desire to save democracy comes with its own peril... as   Rome found out.
But that message got drowned out in the ensuing controversy
Which was "Senators Stab Trump in Central Park Performance of Shakespeare's 
Julius Caesar."

Of course, Eustis and Shapiro, who consulted on the production, were shocked at the reaction...
Leading Shapiro to write that "the Right was willing to display a ruthlessness (in response to this   production) that the Left could rarely match."

I guess it didn't occur to either of them that putting on a production of a play about the assassination
  of a populist leader
Who is hated by the elites and dressed to look like a recently elected populist president
Who is also hated by the elites
Might be a problem...
Particularly when it is performed the same month that a Bernie Bro came to close murdering a Trump     supporting congressman...

Shapiro's shocked face at how this all played out
Indicates to me that when he made his post election pilgrimage to the Red States to try and understand
  how Trump got elected
He didn't get out of his car...

Which is a shame, because instead of writing a book that might have been interesting...
He lets his hatred of Trump... and all those supposed racists (in Shapiro's opinion) who supported     him...
Get in the way of the story of why Eustis failed to anticipate the reaction to his Trump as Caesar     production
By some of the 62 million people who voted for the man.

Thoughts on Two Book Reviews I Wish I Had Written

      

      Anthony Lane, “Bill Clinton and James Patterson’s Concussive Collaboration,” The New Yorker, June 18, 2018

      Peter Thonemann, “Passé présomptif,” Times Literary Supplement, May 29, 2018.

 

   First up- Anthony Lane's hilarious piece in The New Yorker about Bill Clinton/James Patterson's The President is Missing, which is a tour de force take-down of the mangled syntax that is apparently the most distinguishing feature of this novel. Lane argues this book would be better titled, The President is Cashing In, because the former president chose to partner with an author who can't write but, nonetheless, manages to sell millions of books to contented customers for whom such a skill "would only get in the way." No one ever said Bill was stupid and one suspects the Clinton Foundation is not raking in the cash like it used to. 

 

   I'll never read this book, but I think I will frame Lane's review. He describes Patterson's prose as a sad land where sentences go to die, apparently while writhing on the ground in a crumpled mess of twisted syntax. As do many a successful and prolific author, Patterson runs a writing shop employing multiple assistants, which perhaps explains why his prose has a cut and paste feel. But Lane points out that the problem with “Patterson’s” writing is more than a lack of segues and painful mixed metaphors, such as "She had to bite her tongue and accept her place as second fiddle."

 

   It's much worse than that...

 

   Apparently, the characters in The President is Missing express themselves like eager extra-terrestrials who have completed all but one module of their human conversion course and so say things like "Her face becomes a poker face wall" and "Volkov's eyebrows flare a bit;" phrases which immediately brought to mind images of the Coneheads. 

 

And it gets better....

 

  Lane points out that these characters also indulge in gestures that would be difficult, if not physically dangerous to emulate, even in the safety of your own home. For example, "Carolyn tucks in her lips," "Casey falls to a crouch, gripping her hair," and "My head on a swivel, I focus on Devin." However, the best line in the book must be when the president "uncurls the gooseneck stem of the microphone so that it is taut, fully extended."

 

 And I thought I read some crazy shit grading student’s papers...

 

Now, no one is surprised to see sarcasm in The New Yorker, but in a book review in the TLS?

 

   Peter Thonemann's review of Jean-Louis Brunaux's Vercingéturix has a chatty feel not usually seen in the TLS, but it's the subtitle that says it all: "How to write a biography based an almost nothing."

Ouch..

 

   But this review is more than a critique of this biography of Vercingéturix; it is a how to manual for historians struggling with their research. And that is its real genius. 

 

   Want to write a biography about someone for whom you cannot find a shred of evidence- no problem. Thonemann points out that all you have to do is be like Brunaux -just select the right verb tense.

 

   So Thonemann’s real contribution is that he shows how Brunaux employed the passé présomptif to make many of the problems facing a biographer of Vercingéturix disappear. It was all so easy- Brunaux just wrote that "presumably" Vercingéturix came from a chieftain's family, "possibly" walked over this river, or "probably" slept here.

 

You get the point...

 

And it's actually quite brilliant if you think about it...

 

  No need for hours spent hunched over dusty documents in the archives. Brunaux has revealed a secret weapon that can be at the fingertip of any historian.  One can simply substitute verb tense for actual evidence.

 

If only I had known...

 

  Plus, when you employ the passé présomptif you can never be refuted.  So Brunaux could pick any object from first century Gaul and voilà- he found something Vercingétirux would have eaten, must have seen...

 

And who could argue...

 

So Thonemann tells struggling historians there is no reason for despair. Like Brunaux, anyone can string together "enough statements in the passé présomptif to write a 156 page biography without ever breaking a sweat."

 

Who knew this was going to be so easy…

June 2018

Letter to Someone Who Will Remain Anonymous Regarding a Gift of Three Books:

     Christopher Hitchens, Arguably: Essays by Christopher Hitchens

       George Orwell, A Collection of Essays

       Joan Didion, Slouching Towards Bethlehem

  I know... I wasn't supposed to gift books, but I woke up this morning inspired to send these three your way on the hunch that you might like them.

They are yours to do with as you please...read them, burn them in your fireplace on a cold night, or send them to the local library.

I chose these three because they are books of essays...which seemed fitting for someone who likes to wash a dish and read a chapter.

And because they are by my favorite essayists, who all dismantle shibboleths in ways that left me wondering... "How did I ( and so many others) not see that?"

Hitchens is the clever Oxford educated erudite who wields a rapier against his enemies. He wants them to see the blade coming...and to feel it when he shoves it in. He also understands that brevity is the soul of wit ( to borrow a phrase)

 

Orwell presents himself as the voice of common sense and reason. He takes a bit too long to get where he is going, but once there you realize how much damage he has done... and that he has not been subtle about it. His instrument is the broadsword, not a rapier, and he sneaks up from behind before anyone can know what hit them. And when he is done ideas that you had accepted so comfortably before have very clearly been dispatched.

 

Didion, on the other hand, is sly. She prefers slow acting poison; the kind you don't realize has been ingested until too late. If Hitchens is a bit of a show off (and I love that about him), Didion is seductive; more lyrical and, thus, probably the most pleasurable of the three to read. But unlike the men, she likes to wrap herself in a bit of mystery and so you are never quite sure where she has taken you...or why, which is what I think makes her interesting.

 

Although they each employ different instruments, these writers dismember accepted truths in such clever ways that reading them reminds me of Emerson's remark that in every work of genius we recognize our own rejected thoughts as they come back to us with a certain alienated majesty.

December 2017

Digging Up Dead...

January 2017

Reflections on Grieving by  Roger Rosenblatt, Making Toast

                                                   Elizabeth Alexander, The Light of the World

                                                   Antonia Fraser, Must You Go? My Life With Harold

                                                                               Pinter

                                                   Joyce Carol Oates, A Widow's Story

                                                   Joan Didion, The Year of Magical Thinking and Blue

                                                                         Nights

 

Should a husband be worried if his wife starts reading books written by widows?

May be not- after all, I have also been reading works written by grieving parents...

So I think, at the moment, I am just digging up the dead

Unfortunately few of these books  have been worth the time

 

Which is why  I want to know what the acquisition editor was thinking who green lit Roger Rosenblatt's Making Toast about the death of his daughter?

Oh wait- maybe because they thought  someone like me would be willing to buy the book because it would get good reviews

After all - wouldn't the literati likely feel sorry for one of their own and write a glowing book review

They obviously did - but seriously?

It reads like something I would have written in high school

Yes- there are a few compelling passages, such as the description of how the author found his  young grandson some months after his mother's death, lying on the floor with his tongue hanging out, mimicking  how the child had found her on  the day she died

But these are few and far between in what is basically a litany of the daily duties of self sacrificing grandparents who have moved in to take care of the children

 

But Making Toast  does offer a useful warning .. .

Stay off that treadmill!

Which proved as deadly  for Rosenblatt's daughter as it did Sheryl Sandberg's husband

It's amazing the number of people taken out in the prime of their lives by this device ... including Elizabeth Alexander's husband

 

Thankfully, The Light of the World is a more interesting read than Making Toast

Primarily because Ficre sounds like someone I would have enjoyed knowing

 And Alexander keeps the reader engaged with prose that is almost dream like

You can feel Ficre's presence throughout the book- large, luminous, and full of life

So it is easy to feel Alexander's loss

Yet although well written, this book is basically another 200 page eulogy

 

So both of these works follow the John Gunther model from Death be Not Proud

Describe the deceased as a uniformly wonderful person who is sorely missed

Because they were so special

Now- that's original...

 

At least Antonia Fraser's Must You Go?: My Life With Harold Pinter moves beyond that worn out trope

But not in a necessarily better direction...

Fraser writes like she is taking notes for a historical biography ...surprise.

We went to tea at two, had dinner at eight with X - and they served fish

My God woman- you left your husband and the father of your children for this man- and all you can tell us is the time and date you met him?

And talk about that British stiff upper lip- when you tell your first husband you are leaving him he reacts as if you have just informed him that you will be spending the holiday in the south of France

Of course, Pinter dies at the end- but in a matter of fact way

So at least Fraser resists the urge to eulogize him

But his death comes across as an epilogue to a book that is basically about the coming and going of the literary set in England

 

In contrast, Joyce Carol Oates seems to have been genuinely put off her game by the death of her husband in A Widow's Story

But mostly because it disrupted her otherwise well ordered life

One gets the sense that Raymond was a very useful appendage  - and so, of course, soon after he died suddenly, she replaced him

But Oates doesn't tell us that part of the story- because this widow's story is all about her

How will she manage without the man who apparently fetched her tea.

In the end- quite well it seems, because he was ultimately easily-  and quickly- replaced

That said, Oates is a descriptive writer and I am pretty certain I could find my way around her house blindfolded after reading where Raymond was sitting when he first became ill and in how many rooms she had to hunt for her glasses after he died

 

So into this mostly sorry lot comes Joan Didion, who wrote not one, but two books about the deaths of  members of her immediate family: The Year of Magical Thinking and Blue Nights

The second comes across as an afterthought because the death of her daughter seems to have been far less traumatic than the earlier death of her husband

So Blue Nights made me feel even sorrier for poor Quintana, who in her mother's other works always seemed like a piece of furniture shoved off in a corner in the glorious house of Didion and Dunne

Thus Blue Nights hardly rates a mention, but The Year of Magical Thinking is another story

 

 In this first book Didion describes the fugue state that so many patients  have told me they enter after the death of a  loved one

So it is about more than grief

She describes the sense of dissociation that comes with the loss of someone with whom one has shared a life...

The sleepless nights; disrupted thinking; and the inability to move forward- emotionally and sometimes physically

Which is why this is such a useful book- and the one I would recommend to those  who are not yet part of this unfortunate club- and especially to health care providers

 

Those of us familiar with Didion's oeuvre know hers was not always a happy marriage and Dunne is not eulogized here nor is he demonized

And he is not given a central role in what is basically a story about the impact of his death on his widow

 

So the tale Didion has to tell is not unique...

But what separates this book from these other works is that Didion's strength as a writer is well suited for this task

As she demonstrated In Where I'm From,  she has the ability, much like Orwell, to see clearly what others often miss

So she gets that death is about more than grief for the survivors

And that closure is not about coming to terms with the death of a loved one, but rather exiting the fog  filled state she so ably describes

 

So in The Year of Magical Thinking Didion lets the uninitiated in on the secret

Death is really a rite of passage - but for the living- not the dead

And one that leaves the survivors in a liminal state for far longer than most believe

The key word here is -- Year

For it was a year of magical thinking

Because this not a process that can be hurried or talked through

It is almost physiological- and so must run its course

And that insight is what makes The Year of Magical Thinking worth reading

What I am not reading now...

 

I recently started but gave up on:

      Cheryl Strayed, Tiny Beautiful Things: Advice on Love and Life from Dear Sugar

      Joyce Carol Oates, Soul at the White Heat

 

    Strayed needs to learn that brevity is the soul of wit- and don't make everything about you...

We already know the story of your life- try to write about something new

 

   Oates' essays on the writer's life are as obtuse as the title and have the feel of a really bad grad seminar.   

Thoughts on When Breath Becomes Air..

June 2016

 

   First thought- This book is a stark reminder that lung cancer is  one of the worst ways to die.

 

  Second thought- what a great title-  such a concise statement of the Epicurean attitude toward death. I was surprised the quote's source was the Calvinist Fulke Greville, but  who thought more about death than those 17th century poets? That said, the book did not deliver on the promise of the title, which surprised me because it had been marketed as an exploration of regret in the face of death.

 

   It was also not that well written-which made me wonder who has Abraham Verghese been reading or was he just reluctant to speak ill of the dead?

  I was going to give Kalanithi a pass because the book was written when he was severely debilitated from his cancer and likely had chemo brain, until I remembered Christopher Hitchen's essay "Tumor Town" and Oliver  Sack's "My Own Life," which were written under similar circumstances and are wonderful reads.

  

   In contrast, Kalanithi's prose has that declaratory feel that comes from writing only histories and physicals and scientific articles, which made me think he had not done much other writing before he got sick.  Unfortunately, one does not simply decide to sit down one day and  then magically turn out a well written book- unless, of course, you are Christopher Hitchens, who could write beautifully whether drunk, hung over, in a taxi  on his way to a bar- or on his deathbed. There are physicians who write well, Sherwin Nuland and Oliver Sacks are two examples, so I think it is telling that Kalanithi's  pre-cancer plan of having a career as a writer after he was done with medicine was a distant dream  to which he gave little commitment. It obviously wasn't enough to motivate him to seek out at Nuland when they were both at Yale- or even haul his ass off to the Iowa Writer's Workshop, which is what Verghese did.

 

  But his prose aside, this is also not a very deep exploration of facing the hour of one's death, especially for someone with an MA in English literature and philosophy. I sensed that Kalanithi was a flaneur during his time in the humanities and did not drink deeply while he was there. Hitchen's essay "Tumor Town"  is not only a far better read, but a more in depth contemplation of the existential while coping with a body riddled with cancer.

 

  That said, I wasn't surprised that a neurosurgeon failed to probe this topic well, for this is a specialty that practices in a  very dark corner of medicine where few patients are made better and many worse   Kalanithi hints that they often have to look away from what they have wrought- but more importantly, they can, because after surgery the patient becomes someone else's problem and can be consigned to that part of the surgeon's brain that simply tallies up wins and losses.

   

     Which brings me to the best part of this book- its window into the life of a surgical resident- and tellingly Kalanithi's prose is the most engaging when he is describing what happens in the OR. Thirty six hours at the operating table and stamina that requires is like running a marathon. That Kalanithi can do that while riddled with cancer and in pain is a testament to not just his resolve but to how well medical residency conditions endurance in young doctors.  That said, I did have to wonder what supervising physician would let him operate in a field where a millimeter can mean life or death when he had to have been on some pretty potent pain meds?  

 

  This book also gives an occasional glimpse into how the culture of medicine has changed for the worse in the land of rationed resources as well as demonstrates the impact of its sometimes ugly stepchild: the medical algorithm.  Kalanithi's cancer diagnosis was delayed because he didn't have an MRI right away because the protocol called for the cheaper X-ray first.  He knew this was wrongheaded, but didn't try and buck the system, perhaps because he didn't want to have to pay out of pocket for the MRI, which would likely have happened if he had been insistent on getting the right test immediately. Maybe his cancer was so far advanced at that point it wouldn't have made a difference, but was his life really worth that $2000?

 

   And when a really obnoxious medical resident refuses to give him his Tarceva, he couldn't insist the resident  call the attending, his oncologist , because she was out of town doing what really matters in academic medicine - the conference circuit.  This resident was a product of a culture ruled by algorithms and not sound clinical judgment.  Unfortunately, when wiser heads were unavailable Kalanithi was too sick to be successful as his own advocate- but I did wonder where was his wife? Why wasn't she fighting for her husband?

 

  Which brings me to the final weakness of this book- Kalanithi always holds something back- even when talking about his marital problems. That is unfortunate and makes this a less compelling book. As Mary Karr wrote in the Art of the Memoir  an author must be ruthless in their revelations- no matter who they expose. Kalanithi just couldn't do that. Perhaps a man who spent so much of his life building a gold plated resume ( and who seemed most to care at the end that he finish a residency that had been rendered meaningless by his impending death, but would nevertheless complete a line on his vita) was probably incapable of the kind of unmasking that makes a good memoir.

 

    And maybe he got what he really wanted out of this project- an op ed published in the NYT, a great obituary, and a posthumous article about his life in this week's New England Journal of Medicine.

 

   One final thought- Kalanithi and someone I know were undergrads at Stanford the same time as Art, a young man of means from one of the Stans. This student used to tell me about how Art played the piano in the dorm lounge every night until he came back his sophomore year without an arm- and with the knowledge that the cancer that had been diagnosed before he came to college had returned- and would soon kill him. Six months later he died alone in his dorm room- his family thousands of miles away- another reminder of not just a young life cut short, but of how hard it is to let go of the future- which was the real message of Kalanithi's book

bottom of page